01
Bring what you already know
Start with records you already have. You do not need to order a new set of tests just to collect context for a report. Keep dates and units beside any results, and distinguish a confirmed family diagnosis from a recollection or an unanswered question.
- Your main question: what you would like the report to help you understand.
- Existing measurements: the result, date and units, if available.
- Family history: the relative, condition and age at diagnosis, where known.
- Current context: medicines, screening history and relevant symptoms.
- Missing information: say what is unknown rather than filling in the gaps.
Open a blank context checklist
Bring what you already know
Start with records you already have. You do not need to order a new set of tests just to collect context for a report. Keep dates and units beside any results, and distinguish a confirmed family diagnosis from a recollection or an unanswered question.
For a paper copy, open this checklist and use your browser’s Print command. The guide will be included in print preview; choose the pages you need. Keep completed notes private.
Your main question: what you would like the report to help you understand.
Existing measurements: the result, date and units, if available.
Family history: the relative, condition and age at diagnosis, where known.
Current context: medicines, screening history and relevant symptoms.
Missing information: say what is unknown rather than filling in the gaps.
Organising existing information, not a personal health assessment. Leave unknowns marked as unknown.
02
Why labs help
Routine biomarkers can show whether a genetic tendency is already visible in real-world measurements. For example, lipid, glucose, inflammation, vitamin, or thyroid results can change the priority of a finding.
03
Why family history helps
Family history can help put a genetic finding in context. Record what is known, including the condition and age at diagnosis, and say when information is missing. An unknown or incomplete family history should not be treated as evidence that a condition is absent.
04
What if I do not have either?
A report can still organize what is worth checking next. In that case, the output should be more careful: practical questions, suggested measurements to consider, and clear notes on what remains unknown.